Reference. Reflexive graph lenses in univalent foundations

Martin-Löf’s identity types provide a generic (albeit opaque) notion of identification or “equality” between any two elements of the same type, embodied in a canonical reflexive graph structure (=𝐴,𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐥) on any type 𝐴. The miracle of Voevodsky’s univalence principle is that it ensures, for essentially any naturally occurring structure in mathematics, that the resultant notion of identification is equivalent to the type of isomorphisms in the category of such structures. Characterisations of this kind are not automatic and must be established one-by-one; to this end, several authors have employed reflexive graphs and displayed reflexive graphs to organise the characterisation of identity types. We contribute reflexive graph lenses, a new family of intermediate abstractions lying between families of reflexive graphs and displayed reflexive graphs that simplifies the characterisation of identity types for complex structures. Every reflexive graph lens gives rise to a (more complicated) displayed reflexive graph, and our experience suggests that many naturally occurring displayed reflexive graphs arise in this way. Evidence for the utility of reflexive graph lenses is given by means of several case studies, including the theory of reflexive graphs itself as well as that of polynomial type operators. Finally, we exhibit an equivalence between the type of reflexive graph fibrations and the type of univalent reflexive graph lenses.

Cite

Cite as @sterling-2026-reflexive (helia, typst) · \cite{sterling-2026-reflexive} (LaTeX)
BibTeX
bibtex · 1 line
@article{sterling-2026-reflexive, title={Reflexive graph lenses in univalent foundations}, volume={36}, ISSN={1469-8072}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0960129526100565}, DOI={10.1017/s0960129526100565}, journal={Mathematical Structures in Computer Science}, publisher={Cambridge University Press (CUP)}, author={Sterling, Jonathan}, year={2026} }
hayagriva YAML (typst)
yaml · 14 lines
sterling-2026-reflexive:
  type: article
  title: Reflexive graph lenses in univalent foundations
  author: Sterling, Jonathan
  date: 2026
  url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0960129526100565
  serial-number:
    doi: 10.1017/s0960129526100565
    issn: 1469-8072
  parent:
    type: periodical
    title: Mathematical Structures in Computer Science
    publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    volume: 36
Cites 30 works (6 here)
With notes (6)

Internal Parametricity, without an Interval altenkirch-2024-internal

Parametricity is a property of the syntax of type theory implying, e.g., that there is only one function having the type of the polymorphic identity function. Parametricity is usually proven externally, and does not hold internally. Internalising it is difficult because once there is a term witnessing parametricity, it also has to be parametric itself and this results in the appearance of higher dimensional cubes. In previous theories with internal parametricity, either an explicit syntax for higher cubes is present or the theory is extended with a new sort for the interval. In this paper we present a type theory with internal parametricity which is a simple extension of Martin-Löf type theory: there are a few new type formers, term formers and equations. Geometry is not explicit in this syntax, but emergent: the new operations and equations only refer to objects up to dimension 3. We show that this theory is modelled by presheaves over the BCH cube category. Fibrancy conditions are not needed because we use span-based rather than relational parametricity. We define a gluing model for this theory implying that external parametricity and canonicity hold. The theory can be seen as a special case of a new kind of modal type theory, and it is the simplest setting in which the computational properties of higher observational type theory can be demonstrated.
PDF · DOI · arXiv · pldb

Cubical Agda: A Dependently Typed Programming Language with Univalence and Higher Inductive Types VezzosiMortbergAbel2019

Proof assistants based on dependent type theory provide expressive languages for both programming and proving within the same system. However, all of the major implementations lack powerful extensionality principles for reasoning about equality, such as function and propositional extensionality. These principles are typically added axiomatically which disrupts the constructive properties of these systems. Cubical type theory provides a solution by giving computational meaning to Homotopy Type Theory and Univalent Foundations, in particular to the univalence axiom and higher inductive types. This paper describes an extension of the dependently typed functional programming language Agda with cubical primitives, making it into a full-blown proof assistant with native support for univalence and a general schema of higher inductive types. These new primitives make function and propositional extensionality as well as quotient types directly definable with computational content. Additionally, thanks also to copatterns, bisimilarity is equivalent to equality for coinductive types. This extends Agda with support for a wide range of extensionality principles, without sacrificing type checking and constructivity.
PDF · DOI · pldb

Displayed Categories ahrens-lumsdaine-2019

We introduce and develop the notion of displayed categories. A displayed category over a category C is equivalent to “a category D and functor F : D –> C”, but instead of having a single collection of “objects of D” with a map to the objects of C, the objects are given as a family indexed by objects of C, and similarly for the morphisms. This encapsulates a common way of building categories in practice, by starting with an existing category and adding extra data/properties to the objects and morphisms. The interest of this seemingly trivial reformulation is that various properties of functors are more naturally defined as properties of the corresponding displayed categories. Grothendieck fibrations, for example, when defined as certain functors, use equality on objects in their definition. When defined instead as certain displayed categories, no reference to equality on objects is required. Moreover, almost all examples of fibrations in nature are, in fact, categories whose standard construction can be seen as going via displayed categories. We therefore propose displayed categories as a basis for the development of fibrations in the type-theoretic setting, and similarly for various other notions whose classical definitions involve equality on objects. Besides giving a conceptual clarification of such issues, displayed categories also provide a powerful tool in computer formalisation, unifying and abstracting common constructions and proof techniques of category theory, and enabling modular reasoning about categories of multi-component structures. As such, most of the material of this article has been formalised in Coq over the UniMath library, with the aim of providing a practical library for use in further developments.

We introduce and develop the notion of displayed categories. A displayed category over a category 𝐶 is equivalent to “a category 𝐷 and functor 𝐹:𝐷→𝐶, but instead of having a single collection of “objects of 𝐷” with a map to the objects of 𝐶, the objects are given as a family indexed by objects of 𝐶, and similarly for the morphisms. This encapsulates a common way of building categories in practice, by starting with an existing category and adding extra data/properties to the objects and morphisms. The interest of this seemingly trivial reformulation is that various properties of functors are more naturally defined as properties of the corresponding displayed categories. Grothendieck fibrations, for example, when defined as certain functors, use equality on objects in their definition. When defined instead as certain displayed categories, no reference to equality on objects is required. Moreover, almost all examples of fibrations in nature are, in fact, categories whose standard construction can be seen as going via displayed categories. We therefore propose displayed categories as a basis for the development of fibrations in the type-theoretic setting, and similarly for various other notions whose classical definitions involve equality on objects. Besides giving a conceptual clarification of such issues, displayed categories also provide a powerful tool in computer formalisation, unifying and abstracting common constructions and proof techniques of category theory, and enabling modular reasoning about categories of multi-component structures. As such, most of the material of this article has been formalised in Coq over the UniMath library, with the aim of providing a practical library for use in further developments.

DOI · arXiv

Homotopy Type Theory: Univalent Foundations of Mathematics hottbook

Web · arXiv

Observational equality, now! altenkirch-2007-observational

DOI

Sketches of an Elephant: A Topos Theory Compendium johnstone-2002

Web
External (24)
sterling-2026-reflexive reference entries/refs/sterling-2026-reflexive/sterling-2026-reflexive.hel