Floating-point round-off errors are ubiquitous in numerically intensive programs arising in fields such as scientific computing and optimization. As floating-point errors potentially lead to unexpected and catastrophic program failures, one must derive guaranteed round-off thresholds to ensure the correctness of these programs. However, deterministic round-off thresholds tend to be too conservative to be usable in practice, since they often involve large round-off errors that occur with small probability. Probabilistic thresholds relax deterministic ones by specifying that the probability of the round-off error exceeding a threshold is below a given confidence. In this work, we propose a novel approach to probabilistic round-off analysis, by applying concentration inequalities over the Taylor expansion from FPTaylor (TOPLAS 2018). A major obstacle in applying concentration inequalities is that the Taylor expansion involves absolute value operators that make the calculation of the expected values of the first order partial differential terms difficult. Our first step to overcome this obstacle is a sound over-approximation that removes the absolute value operators in polynomial expressions. Then, we show how to handle fractional expressions by a transformation into polynomial case. Finally, we show how to improve our approach with range partitioning. Our approach is scalable since the key computational part is the calculation of expected values of polynomial expressions with independent variables, for which the linear and independence properties of expectation boost the computation. Experimental results show that our approach is orders of magnitude more time efficient, while producing thresholds with comparable precision against the state of the art.

Levy’s call-by-push-value (CBPV) is a language that subsumes both call-by-name and call-by-value lambda calculi by syntactically distinguishing values from computations and explicitly specifying execution order. This low-level handling of computation suspension and resumption makes CBPV suitable as a compiler intermediate representation (IR), while its substitution evaluation semantics affords compositional reasoning about programs. In particular, βη -equivalences in CBPV have been used to justify compiler optimizations in low-level IRs. However, these equivalences do not validate commuting conversions , which are key transformations in compiler passes such as A-normalization. Such transformations syntactically rearrange computations without affecting evaluation order, and can reveal new opportunities for inlining. In this work, we identify the commuting conversions of CBPV, define a commuting conversion normal form (CCNF) for CBPV, present a single-pass transformation into CCNF based on A-normalization, and prove that well-typed, translated programs evaluate to the same result. To avoid the usual code duplication issues that also arise with A-normal form, we adapt the explicit join point constructs by Maurer et al. [2017] . Our results are all mechanized in Lean 4.

Mixed choice multiparty message passing is an expressive concurrency programming paradigm where components use non-determinism to choose between concurrent options for sending and receiving messages. This flexibility makes it possible to program advanced algorithms, such as leader election protocols, succinctly. We present Mixtris, a mechanised higher-order separation logic for reasoning about functional correctness of higher-order imperative programs with mixed choice multiparty message passing in a shared memory setting. Mixtris builds upon recent work on separation logic for (non-mixed choice) multiparty message-passing programs, by drawing inspiration from session type systems for mixed choice multiparty message-passing programs. Mixtris is the first program logic for mixed choice multiparty message passing. We prove soundness of Mixtris using a novel model of our mixed choice multiparty protocols. We demonstrate how Mixtris can be used to formally reason about challenging examples, including some leader election protocols such as Chang and Roberts’s ring leader election protocol. All the results in the paper (both meta-theory and examples) have been formalised in the Rocq proof assistant on top of the Iris program logic framework.

Higher-order concurrent separation logics, such as Iris, have been tremendously successful in verifying safety properties of concurrent programs. However, state-of-the-art attempts to verify liveness properties in such logics have so far either lacked modularity (the ability to compose specifications of independent modules), or they have been far too complex to mechanize in a proof assistant. In this work, we introduce Lawyer — a mechanized program logic for modular verification of (fair) termination of concurrent programs. Lawyer draws inspiration from state-of-the-art approaches that use obligations for specifying and proving termination. However, unlike these approaches, which incorporate obligations by instrumenting the source code with erasable auxiliary code and state, Lawyer avoids such instrumentations. Instead, Lawyer incorporates obligations into the logic by embedding them into a purely logical labeled transition system that the program is shown to refine — this makes Lawyer far more amenable to mechanization. We demonstrate the expressivity of Lawyer by verifying termination of a range of examples, including modular verification of a client program whose termination relies on correctness of a fair lock library, and (separately) proving that a ticket lock implementation implements that library’s interface. To the best of our knowledge, Lawyer is the first mechanized program logic that supports modular higher-order impredicative liveness specifications of program modules. All the results that appear in the paper have been mechanized in the Rocq proof assistant on top of the Iris separation logic framework.

Information flow control is a long-studied approach for establishing non-interference properties of programs. For instance, it can be used to prove that a secret does not interfere with some computation, thereby establishing that the former does not leak through the latter. Despite their potential as a holy grail for security reasoning and their maturity within the literature, information flow type systems have seen limited adoption. In practice, information flow specifications tend to be excessively complex and can easily spiral out of control even for simple programs. Additionally, while non-interference is well-behaved in an idealized setting where information leakage never occurs, most practical programs must violate non-interference in order to fulfill their purpose. Useful information flow type systems in prior work must therefore contend with a definition of non-interference extended with declassification, which often offers weaker modular reasoning properties. We introduce structural information flow, which both illuminates and addresses these issues from a logical viewpoint. In particular, we draw on established insights from the modal logic literature to argue that information flow reasoning arises from hybrid logic, rather than conventional modal logic as previously imagined. We show with a range of examples that structural information flow specifications are straightforward to write and easy to visually parse. Uniquely in the structural setting, we demonstrate that declassification emerges not as an aberration to non-interference, but as a natural and unavoidable consequence of sufficiently general machinery for information flow. This flavor of declassification features excellent local reasoning and enables our approach to account for real-world information flow needs without compromising its theoretical elegance. Finally, we establish non-interference via a logical relations approach, showing off its simplicity in the face of the expressive power captured.

Rust’s novel type system has proved an attractive target for verification and program analysis tools, due to the rich guarantees it provides for controlling aliasing and mutability. However, fully understanding, extracting and exploiting these guarantees is subtle and challenging: existing models for Rust’s type checking either support a smaller idealised language disconnected from real-world Rust code, or come with severe limitations in terms of precise modelling of Rust borrows, composite types storing them, function signatures and loops. In this paper, we present Place Capability Graphs : a novel model of Rust’s type-checking results, which lifts these limitations, and which can be directly calculated from the Rust compiler’s own programmatic representations and analyses. We demonstrate that our model supports over 97% of Rust functions in the most popular public crates, and show its suitability as a general-purpose basis for verification and program analysis tools by developing promising new prototype versions of the existing Flowistry and Prusti tools.

Secure, performant execution of untrusted code—as promised by WebAssembly (Wasm)—requires correct compilation to native code that enforces a sandbox. Errors in instruction selection can undermine the sandbox’s guarantees, but prior verification work struggles to scale to the complexity of realistic industrial compilers. We present Arrival , an instruction-selection verifier for the Cranelift production Wasm-to-native compiler. Arrival enables end-to-end, high-assurance verification while reducing developer effort. Arrival ( 1 ) automatically reasons about chains of instruction-selection rules, thereby reducing the need for develop-er-supplied intermediate specifications, ( 2 ) introduces a lightweight, efficient method for reasoning about stateful instruction-selection rules, and ( 3 ) automatically derives high-assurance machine code specifications. Our work verifies nearly all AArch64 instruction-selection rules reachable from Wasm core. Furthermore, Arrival reduces the developer effort required: 60 % of all specifications benefit from our automation, thereby requiring 2.6 × fewer hand-written specifications than prior approaches. Arrival finds new bugs in Cranelift’s instruction selection, and it is viable for integration into production workflows.

Code editors provide essential services that help developers understand, navigate, and modify programs. However, these services often fail in the presence of syntax errors. Existing syntax error recovery techniques, like panic mode and multi-option repairs, are either too coarse, e.g. in deleting large swathes of code, or lead to a proliferation of possible completions. This paper introduces tall tylr , an error-handling parser and editor generator that completes malformed code with syntactic obligations that abstract over many possible completions. These obligations generalize the familiar notion of holes in structure editors to cover missing operands, operators, delimiters, and sort transitions. tall tylr is backed by a novel theory of tile-based parsing, conceptually organized around a molder that turns tokens into tiles and a melder that completes and parses tiles into terms using an error-handling generalization of operator-precedence parsing. We formalize melding as a parsing calculus, meldr, that completes input tiles with additional obligations such that it can be parsed into a well-formed term, with success guaranteed over all inputs. We further describe how tall tylr implements molding and completionranking using the principle of minimizing obligations . Obligations offer a useful way to scaffold internal program representations, but in tall tylr we go further to investigate the potential of materializing these obligations visually to the programmer. We conduct a user study to evaluate the extent to which an editor like tall tylr that materializes syntactic obligations might be usable and useful, finding both points of positivity and interesting new avenues for future work.

Live programming environments provide various semantic services, including type checking and evaluation, continuously as the user is editing the program. The live paradigm promises to improve the developer experience, but liveness is an implementation challenge, particularly when working with large programs. This paper specifies and efficiently implements a system that is able to incrementally update type information for a live program in response to fine-grained program edits. This information includes type error marks and information about the expected and actual type of every expression. The system is specified type-theoretically as a small-step dynamics that propagates updates through the marked and annotated program. Most updates flow according to a base bidirectional type system. Additional pointers are maintained to connect bound variables to their binding locations, with type updates traversing these pointers directly. Order maintenance data structures are employed to efficiently maintain these pointers and to prioritize the order of update propagation. We prove this system is equivalent to naive reanalysis in the Agda theorem prover, along with other important metatheoretic properties. We then provide an efficient OCaml implementation, detailing a number of impactful optimizations. We evaluate this implementation’s performance with a large stress-test and find that it is able to achieve multiple orders of magnitude speed-up compared to from-scratch reanalysis.

Proofs in proof assistants like Rocq can be brittle, breaking easily in response to changes. To address this, recent work introduced an algorithm and tool in Rocq to automatically repair broken proofs in response to changes that correspond to type equivalences. However, many changes remained out of the scope of this algorithm and tool—especially changes in underlying behavior . We extend this proof repair algorithm so that it can express certain changes in behavior that were previously out of scope. We focus in particular on equivalences between quotient types —types equipped with a relation that describes what it means for any two elements of that type to be equal. Quotient type equivalences can be used to express interesting changes in representations of mathematical structures, as well as changes in the implementations of data structures. We extend this algorithm and tool to support quotient type equivalences in Rocq. Notably, since Rocq lacks quotient types entirely, our extensions use Rocq’s setoid machinery in place of quotients. Specifically, (1) our extension to the algorithm supports new changes corresponding to setoids, and (2) our extension to the tool supports this new class of changes and further automates away some of the new proof obligations. We demonstrate our extensions on proof repair case studies for previously unsupported changes. We also perform manual proof repair in Cubical Agda, a language with a univalent metatheory, which allows us to construct the first ever internal proofs of correctness for proof repair.

Linear type systems are powerful because they can statically ensure the correct management of resources like memory, but they can also be cumbersome to work with, since even benign uses of a resource require that it be explicitly threaded through during computation. Borrowing , as popularized by Rust, reduces this burden by allowing one to temporarily disable certain resource permissions (e.g., deallocation or mutation) in exchange for enabling certain structural permissions (e.g., weakening or contraction). In particular, this mechanism spares the borrower of a resource from having to explicitly return it to the lender but nevertheless ensures that the lender eventually reclaims ownership of the resource. In this paper, we elucidate the semantics of borrowing by starting with a standard linear type system for ensuring safe manual memory management in an untyped lambda calculus and gradually augmenting it with immutable borrows, lexical lifetimes, reborrowing, and finally mutable borrows. We prove semantic type soundness for our Borrow Calculus ( BoCa ) using Borrow Logic ( BoLo ), a novel domain-specific separation logic for borrowing. We establish the soundness of this logic using a semantic model that additionally guarantees that our calculus is terminating and free of memory leaks. We also show that our Borrow Logic is robust enough to establish the semantic safety of some syntactically ill-typed programs that temporarily break but reestablish invariants.

Type-preserving compilation seeks to make intent as much as a part of compilation as computation . Specifications of intent in the form of types are preserved and exploited during compilation and linking, alongside the mere computation of a program. This provides lightweight guarantees for compilation, optimization, and linking. Unfortunately, type-preserving compilation typically interferes with important optimizations. In this paper, we study typed closure representation and optimization. We analyze limitations in prior typed closure conversion representations, and the requirements of many important closure optimizations. We design a new typed closure representation in our Flat-Closure Calculus (FCC) that admits all these optimizations, prove type safety and subject reduction of FCC, prove type preservation from an existing closure converted IR to FCC, and implement common closure optimizations for FCC.

There are many different probabilistic programming languages that are specialized to specific kinds of probabilistic programs. From a usability and scalability perspective, this is undesirable: today, probabilistic programmers are forced up-front to decide which language they want to use and cannot mix-and-match different languages for handling heterogeneous programs. To rectify this, we seek a foundation for sound interoperability for probabilistic programming languages: just as today’s Python programmers can resort to low-level C programming for performance, we argue that probabilistic programmers should be able to freely mix different languages for meeting the demands of heterogeneous probabilistic programming environments. As a first step towards this goal, we introduce Multi PPL, a probabilistic multi-language that enables programmers to interoperate between two different probabilistic programming languages: one that leverages a high-performance exact discrete inference strategy, and one that uses approximate importance sampling. We give a syntax and semantics for Multi PPL, prove soundness of its inference algorithm, and provide empirical evidence that it enables programmers to perform inference on complex heterogeneous probabilistic programs and flexibly exploits the strengths and weaknesses of two languages simultaneously.

Reasoning about the cost of executing programs is one of the fundamental questions in computer science. In the context of programming with probabilities, however, the notion of cost stops being deterministic, since it depends on the probabilistic samples made throughout the execution of the program. This interaction is further complicated by the non-trivial interaction between cost, recursion and evaluation strategy.

In this work we introduce cert: a Call-By-Push-Value (CBPV) metalanguage for reasoning about probabilistic cost. We equip cert with an operational cost semantics and define two denotational semantics — a cost semantics and an expected-cost semantics. We prove operational soundness and adequacy for the denotational cost semantics and a cost adequacy theorem for the expected-cost semantics.

We formally relate both denotational semantics by stating and proving a novel effect simulation property for CBPV. We also prove a canonicity property of the expected-cost semantics as the minimal semantics for expected cost and probability by building on recent advances on monadic probabilistic semantics.

Finally, we illustrate the expressivity of cert and the expected-cost semantics by presenting case-studies ranging from randomized algorithms to stochastic processes and show how our semantics capture their intended expected cost.

Monads provide a simple and concise interface to user-defined computational effects in functional programming languages. This enables equational reasoning about effects, abstraction over monadic interfaces and the development of monad transformer stacks to allow for multiple effects. Compiler implementors and assembly code programmers similarly virtualize effects, and would benefit from similar abstractions if possible. However, the implementation details of effects seem disconnected from the high-level monad interface: at this lower level much of the design is in the layout of the runtime stack, which is not accessible in a high-level programming language.

We demonstrate that the monadic interface can be faithfully adapted from high-level functional programming to a lower level setting with explicit stack manipulation. We use a polymorphic call-by-push-value (CBPV) calculus as a setting that captures the essence of stack-manipulation, with a type system that allows programs to define domain-specific stack structures. Within this setting, we show that the existing category-theoretic notion of a relative monad can be used to model the stack-based implementation of computational effects. To demonstrate generality, we adapt a variety of standard monads to relative monads. Additionally, we show that stack-manipulating programs can benefit from a generalization of do-notation we call “monadic blocks” that allow all CBPV code to be reinterpreted to work with an arbitrary relative monad. As an application, we show that all relative monads extend automatically to relative monad transformers, a process which is not automatic for monads in pure languages.

Large language models (LLMs) have reshaped the landscape of program synthesis. However, contemporary LLM-based code completion systems often hallucinate broken code because they lack appropriate code context, particularly when working with definitions that are neither in the training data nor near the cursor. This paper demonstrates that tighter integration with the type and binding structure of the programming language in use, as exposed by its language server, can help address this contextualization problem in a token-efficient manner. In short, we contend that AIs need IDEs, too! In particular, we integrate LLM code generation into the Hazel live program sketching environment. The Hazel Language Server is able to identify the type and typing context of the hole that the programmer is filling, with Hazel’s total syntax and type error correction ensuring that a meaningful program sketch is available whenever the developer requests a completion. This allows the system to prompt the LLM with codebase-wide contextual information that is not lexically local to the cursor, nor necessarily in the same file, but that is likely to be semantically local to the developer’s goal. Completions synthesized by the LLM are then iteratively refined via further dialog with the language server, which provides error localization and error messages. To evaluate these techniques, we introduce MVUBench, a dataset of model-view-update (MVU) web applications with accompanying unit tests that have been written from scratch to avoid data contamination, and that can easily be ported to new languages because they do not have large external library dependencies. These applications serve as challenge problems due to their extensive reliance on application-specific data structures. Through an ablation study, we examine the impact of contextualization with type definitions, function headers, and errors messages, individually and in combination. We find that contextualization with type definitions is particularly impactful. After introducing our ideas in the context of Hazel, a low-resource language, we duplicate our techniques and port MVUBench to TypeScript in order to validate the applicability of these methods to higher-resource mainstream languages. Finally, we outline ChatLSP, a conservative extension to the Language Server Protocol (LSP) that language servers can implement to expose capabilities that AI code completion systems of various designs can use to incorporate static context when generating prompts for an LLM.

We present Tachis, a higher-order separation logic to reason about the expected cost of probabilistic programs. Inspired by the uses of time credits for reasoning about the running time of deterministic programs, we introduce a novel notion of probabilistic cost credit. Probabilistic cost credits are a separation logic resource that can be used to pay for the cost of operations in programs, and that can be distributed across all possible branches of sampling instructions according to their weight, thus enabling us to reason about expected cost. The representation of cost credits as separation logic resources gives Tachis a great deal of flexibility and expressivity. In particular, it permits reasoning about amortized expected cost by storing excess credits as potential into data structures to pay for future operations. Tachis further supports a range of cost models, including running time and entropy usage. We showcase the versatility of this approach by applying our techniques to prove upper bounds on the expected cost of a variety of probabilistic algorithms and data structures, including randomized quicksort, hash tables, and meldable heaps. All of our results have been mechanized using Coq, Iris, and the Coquelicot real analysis library.

Compilers for accelerator design languages (ADLs) translate high-level languages into application-specific hardware. ADL compilers rely on a hardware control interface to compose hardware units. There are two choices: static control, which relies on cycle-level timing; or dynamic control, which uses explicit signalling to avoid depending on timing details. Static control is efficient but brittle; dynamic control incurs hardware costs to support compositional reasoning. Piezo is an ADL compiler that unifies static and dynamic control in a single intermediate language (IL). Its key insight is that the IL’s static fragment is a refinement of its dynamic fragment: static code admits a subset of the run-time behaviors of the dynamic equivalent. Piezo can optimize code by combining facts from static and dynamic submodules, and it opportunistically converts code from dynamic to static control styles. We implement Piezo as an extension to an existing dynamic ADL compiler, Calyx. We use Piezo to implement a frontend for an existing ADL, a systolic array generator, and a packet-scheduling hardware generator to demonstrate its optimizations and the static–dynamic interactions it enables.

Coarse-grained reconfigurable arrays (CGRAs) have gained attention in recent years due to their promising power efficiency compared to traditional von Neumann architectures. To program these architectures using ordinary languages such as C, a dataflow compiler must transform the original sequential, imperative program into an equivalent dataflow graph, composed of dataflow operators running in parallel. This transformation is challenging since the asynchronous nature of dataflow graphs allows out-of-order execution of operators, leading to behaviors not present in the original imperative programs. Weaddress this challenge by developing a translation validation technique for dataflow compilers to ensure that the dataflow program has the same behavior as the original imperative program on all possible inputs and schedules of execution. We apply this method to a state-of-the-art dataflow compiler targeting the RipTide CGRAarchitecture. Our tool uncovers 8 compiler bugs where the compiler outputs incorrect dataflow graphs, including a data race that is otherwise hard to discover via testing. After repairing these bugs, our tool verifies the correct compilation of all programs in the RipTide benchmark suite.

In concurrent verification, separation logic provides a strong story for handling both resources that are owned exclusively and resources that are shared persistently (i.e., forever). However, the situation is more complicated for temporarily shared state, where state might be shared and then later reclaimed as exclusive. We believe that a framework for temporarily-shared state should meet two key goals not adequately met by existing techniques. One, it should allow and encourage users to verify new sharing strategies. Two, it should provide an abstraction where users manipulate shared state in a way agnostic to the means with which it is shared. We present Leaf, a library in the Iris separation logic which accomplishes both of these goals by introducing a novel operator, which we call guarding, that allows one proposition to represent a shared version of another. We demonstrate that Leaf meets these two goals through a modular case study: we verify a reader-writer lock that supports shared state, and a hash table built on top of it that uses shared state.

Common data types like dates, addresses, phone numbers and tables can have multiple textual representations, and many heavily-used languages, such as SQL, come in several dialects. These variations can cause data to be misinterpreted, leading to silent data corruption, failure of data processing systems, or even security vulnerabilities. Saggitarius is a new language and system designed to help programmers reason about the format of data, by describing grammatical domains—that is, sets of context-free grammars that describe the many possible representations of a datatype. We describe the design of Saggitarius via example and provide a relational semantics. We show how Saggitarius may be used to analyze a data set: given example data, it uses an algorithm based on semi-ring parsing and MaxSAT to infer which grammar in a given domain best matches that data. We evaluate the effectiveness of the algorithm on a benchmark suite of 110 example problems, and we demonstrate that our system typically returns a satisfying grammar within a few seconds with only a small number of examples. We also delve deeper into a more extensive case study on using Saggitarius for CSV dialect detection. Despite being general-purpose, we find that Saggitarius offers comparable results to hand-tuned, specialized tools; in the case of CSV, it infers grammars for 84% of benchmarks within 60 seconds, and has comparable accuracy to custom-built dialect detection tools.

The Rust programming language provides a powerful type system that checks linearity and borrowing, allowing code to safely manipulate memory without garbage collection and making Rust ideal for developing low-level, high-assurance systems. For such systems, formal verification can be useful to prove functional correctness properties beyond type safety. This paper presents Verus, an SMT-based tool for formally verifying Rust programs. With Verus, programmers express proofs and specifications using the Rust language, allowing proofs to take advantage of Rust’s linear types and borrow checking. We show how this allows proofs to manipulate linearly typed permissions that let Rust code safely manipulate memory, pointers, and concurrent resources. Verus organizes proofs and specifications using a novel mode system that distinguishes specifications, which are not checked for linearity and borrowing, from executable code and proofs, which are checked for linearity and borrowing. We formalize Verus’ linearity, borrowing, and modes in a small lambda calculus, for which we prove type safety and termination of specifications and proofs. We demonstrate Verus on a series of examples, including pointer-manipulating code (an xor-based doubly linked list), code with interior mutability, and concurrent code.

Several modern programming systems, including GHC Haskell, Agda, Idris, and Hazel, support typed holes . Assigning static and, to varying degree, dynamic meaning to programs with holes allows program editors and other tools to offer meaningful feedback and assistance throughout editing, i.e. in a live manner. Prior work, however, has considered only holes appearing in expressions and types. This paper considers, from type theoretic and logical first principles, the problem of typed pattern holes. We confront two main difficulties, (1) statically reasoning about exhaustiveness and irredundancy when patterns are not fully known, and (2) live evaluation of expressions containing both pattern and expression holes. In both cases, this requires reasoning conservatively about all possible hole fillings. We develop a typed lambda calculus, Peanut, where reasoning about exhaustiveness and redundancy is mapped to the problem of deriving first order entailments. We equip Peanut with an operational semantics in the style of Hazelnut Live that allows us to evaluate around holes in both expressions and patterns. We mechanize the metatheory of Peanut in Agda and formalize a procedure capable of deciding the necessary entailments. Finally, we scale up and implement these mechanisms within Hazel, a programming environment for a dialect of Elm that automatically inserts holes during editing to provide static and dynamic feedback to the programmer in a maximally live manner, i.e. for every possible editor state. Hazel is the first maximally live environment for a general-purpose functional language.

Program logics for bug-finding (such as the recently introduced Incorrectness Logic) have framed correctness and incorrectness as dual concepts requiring different logical foundations. In this paper, we argue that a single unified theory can be used for both correctness and incorrectness reasoning. We present Outcome Logic (OL), a novel generalization of Hoare Logic that is both monadic (to capture computational effects) and monoidal (to reason about outcomes and reachability). OL expresses true positive bugs, while retaining correctness reasoning abilities as well. To formalize the applicability of OL to both correctness and incorrectness, we prove that any false OL specification can be disproven in OL itself. We also use our framework to reason about new types of incorrectness in nondeterministic and probabilistic programs. Given these advances, we advocate for OL as a new foundational theory of correctness and incorrectness.

We present a gradually typed language, GrEff, with effects and handlers that supports migration from unchecked to checked effect typing. This serves as a simple model of the integration of an effect typing discipline with an existing effectful typed language that does not track fine-grained effect information. Our language supports a simple module system to model the programming model of gradual migration from unchecked to checked effect typing in the style of Typed Racket.

The surface language GrEff is given semantics by elaboration to a core language Core GrEff. We equip Core GrEff with an inequational theory for reasoning about the semantic error ordering and desired program equivalences for programming with effects and handlers. We derive an operational semantics for the language from the equations provable in the theory. We then show that the theory is sound by constructing an operational logical relations model to prove the graduality theorem. This extends prior work on embedding-projection pair models of gradual typing to handle effect typing and subtyping.