In this paper we show that the Day monoidal product generalises in a straightforward way to other algebraic constructions and partial algebraic constructions on categories. This generalisation was motivated by its applications in logic, for example in hybrid and separation logic. We use the description of the Day monoidal product using profunctors to show that the definition generalises to an extension of an arbitrary algebraic structure on a category to a pseudo-algebraic structure on a functor category. We provide two further extensions. First we consider the case where some of the operations on the category are partial, and second we show that the resulting operations on the functor category have adjoints (they are residuated).

We extend the synthetic theories of discrete and Gaussian categorical probability by introducing a diagrammatic calculus for reasoning about hybrid probabilistic models in which continuous random variables, conditioned on discrete ones, follow a multivariate Gaussian distribution. This setting includes important families of distributions such as Gaussian mixtures, where each Gaussian component is selected according to a discrete variable. We develop a string diagrammatic syntax for distributions of this type, give it a compositional semantics, and equip it with a sound and complete equational theory that characterises when two mixtures represent the same distribution.

A categorical axiomatic theory of creation/annihilation operators on symmetric Fock space is introduced, and the combinatorial model that motivated it is presented. Commutation relations and coherent states are considered in both frameworks.

We introduce contextads and the Ctx construction, unifying various structures and constructions in category theory dealing with context and contextful arrows – comonads and their Kleisli construction, actegories and their Para construction, adequate triples and their Span construction. Contextads are defined in terms of Lack–Street wreaths, suitably categorified for pseudomonads in a tricategory of spans in a 2-category with display maps. The associated wreath product provides the Ctx construction, and by its universal property we conclude trifunctoriality. This abstract approach lets us work up to structure, and thus swiftly prove that, under very mild assumptions, a contextad equipped colaxly with a 2-algebraic structure produces a similarly structured double category of contextful arrows. We also explore the role contextads might play qua dependently graded comonads in organizing contextful computation in functional programming. We show that many side-effects monads can be dually captured by dependently graded comonads, and gesture towards a general result on the ‘transposability’ of parametric right adjoint monads to dependently graded comonads.

We present gradual type theory, a logic and type theory for call-by-name gradual typing. We define the central constructions of gradual typing (the dynamic type, type casts and type error) in a novel way, by universal properties relative to new judgments for gradual type and term dynamism, which were developed in blame calculi and to state the “gradual guarantee” theorem of gradual typing. Combined with the ordinary extensionality ($𝜂$) principles that type theory provides, we show that most of the standard operational behavior of casts is uniquely determined by the gradual guarantee. This provides a semantic justification for the definitions of casts, and shows that non-standard definitions of casts must violate these principles. Our type theory is the internal language of a certain class of preorder categories called equipments. We give a general construction of an equipment interpreting gradual type theory from a 2-category representing non-gradual types and programs, which is a semantic analogue of Findler and Felleisen’s definitions of contracts, and use it to build some concrete domain-theoretic models of gradual typing.

Profunctor optics are a neat and composable representation of bidirectional data accessors, including lenses, and their dual, prisms. The profunctor representation exploits higher-order functions and higher-kinded type constructor classes, but the relationship between this and the familiar representation in terms of “getter” and “setter” functions is not at all obvious. We derive the profunctor representation from the concrete representation, making the relationship clear. It turns out to be a fairly direct application of the Yoneda Lemma, arguably the most important result in category theory. We hope this derivation aids understanding of the profunctor representation. Conversely, it might also serve to provide some insight into the Yoneda Lemma.

Any refinement system (= functor) has a fully faithful representation in the refinement system of presheaves, by interpreting types as relative slice categories, and refinement types as presheaves over those categories. Motivated by an analogy between side effects in programming and context effects in linear logic, we study logical aspects of this ‘positive’ (covariant) representation, as well as of an associated ‘negative’ (contravariant) representation. We establish several preservation properties for these representations, including a generalization of Day’s embedding theorem for monoidal closed categories. Then, we establish that the positive and negative representations satisfy an Isbell-style duality. As corollaries, we derive two different formulas for the positive representation of a pushforward (inspired by the classical negative translations of proof theory), which express it either as the dual of a pullback of a dual or as the double dual of a pushforward. Besides explaining how these constructions on refinement systems generalize familiar category-theoretic ones (by viewing categories as special refinement systems), our main running examples involve representations of Hoare logic and linear sequent calculus.

The standard reading of type theory through the lens of category theory is based on the idea of viewing a type system as a category of well-typed terms. We propose a basic revision of this reading: rather than interpreting type systems as categories, we describe them as functors from a category of typing derivations to a category of underlying terms. Then, turning this around, we explain how in fact any functor gives rise to a generalized type system, with an abstract notion of typing judgment, typing derivations and typing rules. This leads to a purely categorical reformulation of various natural classes of type systems as natural classes of functors.

The main purpose of this paper is to describe the general framework (which can also be seen as providing a categorical analysis of refinement types), and to present a few applications. As a larger case study, we revisit Reynolds’ paper on “The Meaning of Types” (2000), showing how the paper’s main results may be reconstructed along these lines.

We present the general theory of the method of glueing and associated technique of orthogonality for constructing categorical models of all the structure of linear logic: in particular we treat the exponentials in detail. We indicate simple applications of the methods and show that they cover familiar examples.

We show how to solve the word problem for simply typed λβη-calculus by using a few well-known facts about categories of presheaves and the Yoneda embedding. The formal setting for these results is 𝒫-category theory, a version of ordinary category theory where each hom-set is equipped with a partial equivalence relation. The part of 𝒫-category theory we develop here is constructive and thus permits extraction of programs from proofs. It is important to stress that in our method we make no use of traditional proof-theoretic or rewriting techniques. To show the robustness of our method, we give an extended treatment for more general λ-theories in the Appendix.

In Floyd-Hoare logic, programs are dynamic while assertions are static (hold at states). In action logic the two notions become one, with programs viewed as on-the-fly assertions whose truth is evaluated along intervals instead of at states. Action logic is an equational theory ACT conservatively extending the equational theory REG of regular expressions with operations preimplication a→b (had a then b) and postimplication b←a (b if-ever a). Unlike REG, ACT is finitely based, makes a∗ reflexive transitive closure, and has an equivalent Hilbert system. The crucial axiom is that of pure induction, (a→a)∗ = a→a.

Having been under the impression that categorial grammars in general and the so-called syntactic calculus in particular had been swept away by the tide of transformational grammar, I was very surprised to learn of the recent revival of interest in these matters, as, for example, by Buszkowski in Poland and by van Benthem in the Netherlands. Stimulated by the renewed activity in this area, I decided to take another look at it, and in particular, to explore the categorical connection, which had been at the back of my mind all along.