Dependently typed programming languages such as Coq, Agda, Idris, and F*, allow programmers to write detailed specifications of their programs and prove their programs meet these specifications. However, these specifications can be violated during compilation since they are erased after type checking. External programs linked with the compiled program can violate the specifications of the original program and change the behavior of the compiled program – even when compiled with a verified compiler. For example, since Coq does not allow explicitly allocating memory, a programmer might link their Coq program with a C program that can allocate memory. Even if the Coq program is compiled with a verified compiler, the external C program can still violate the memory-safe specification of the Coq program by providing an uninitialized pointer to memory. This error could be ruled out by type checking in a language expressive enough to indicate whether memory is initialized versus uninitialized. Linking with a program with an uninitialized pointer could be considered ill-typed, and our linking process could prevent linking with ill-typed programs. To facilitate type checking during linking, we can use type-preserving compilation, which preserves the types through the compilation process. In this ongoing work, we develop a typed intermediate language that supports dependent memory allocation, as well as a dependent-type-preserving compiler pass for memory allocation.

What are mutable references; what do they mean? The answers to these questions have spawned lots of important theoretical work and form the foundation of many impactful tools. However, existing semantics collapse a key distinction: which allocations does a reference depend on? In this paper, we deconstruct the space of mutable higher-order references. We formalize a novel distinction–splitting the design space of references not only into higher-order vs (full-)ground references, but also dependency of an allocation on past vs future allocations. This distinction is fundamental to a thorny issue that arises in constructing semantic models of mutable references–the type-world circularity. The issue disappears for what we call predicative references, those that only quantify over past, not future, allocations, and for non-higher-order impredicative references. We design a syntax and semantics for each point in our newly described space. The syntax relies on a type universe hierarchy, à la dependent type theory, to kind the types of allocated terms, and stratify allocations. Each type universe corresponds to a semantic Kripke world, giving a lightweight syntactic mechanism to design and restrict heap shapes. The semantics bear a resemblance to work on regions, and suggest some connection between universe systems and regions, which we describe in some detail.

In this work, we explore Landin’s Knot, which is understood as a pattern for encoding general recursion, including non-termination, that is possible after adding higher-order references to an otherwise terminating language. We observe that this isn’t always true – higher-order references, by themselves, don’t lead to non-termination. The key insight is that Landin’s Knot relies not primarily on references storing functions, but on unrestricted quantification over a function’s environment. We show this through a closure converted language, in which the function’s environment is made explicit and hides the type of the environment through impredicative quantification. Once references are added, this impredicative quantification can be exploited to encode recursion. We conjecture that by restricting the quantification over the environment, higher-order references can be safely added to terminating languages, without resorting to more complex type systems such as linearity, and without restricting references from storing functions.

Type-preserving compilation seeks to make intent as much as a part of compilation as computation . Specifications of intent in the form of types are preserved and exploited during compilation and linking, alongside the mere computation of a program. This provides lightweight guarantees for compilation, optimization, and linking. Unfortunately, type-preserving compilation typically interferes with important optimizations. In this paper, we study typed closure representation and optimization. We analyze limitations in prior typed closure conversion representations, and the requirements of many important closure optimizations. We design a new typed closure representation in our Flat-Closure Calculus (FCC) that admits all these optimizations, prove type safety and subject reduction of FCC, prove type preservation from an existing closure converted IR to FCC, and implement common closure optimizations for FCC.

In this paper, we explore a connection between type universes and memory allocation. Type universe hierarchies are used in dependent type theories to ensure consistency, by forbidding a type from quantifying over all types. Instead, the types of types (universes) form a hierarchy, and a type can only quantify over types in other universes (with some exceptions), restricting cyclic reasoning in proofs. We present a perspective where universes also describe where values are allocated in the heap, and the choice of universe algebra imposes a structure on the heap overall. The resulting type system provides a simple declarative system for reasoning about and restricting memory allocation, without reasoning about reads or writes. We present a theoretical framework for equipping a type system with higher-order references restricted by a universe hierarchy, and conjecture that many existing universe algebras give rise to interesting systems for reasoning about allocation. We present 3 instantiations of this approach to enable reasoning about allocation in the simply typed $𝜆$-calculus: (1) the standard ramified universe hierarchy, which we prove guarantees termination of the language extended with higher-order references by restricting cycles in the heap; (2) an extension with an impredicative base universe, which we conjecture enables full-ground references (with terminating computation but cyclic ground data structures); (3) an extension with universe polymorphism, which divides the heap into fine-grained regions.

We present Wasm-precheck, a superset of WebAssembly (Wasm) that uses indexed types to express and check simple constraints over program values. This additional static reasoning enables safely removing dynamic safety checks from Wasm, such as memory bounds checks. We implement Wasm-precheck as an extension of the Wasmtime compiler and runtime, evaluate the run-time and compile-time performance of Wasm-precheck vs Wasm configurations with explicit dynamic checks, and find an average run-time performance gain of 1.71 x faster in the widely used PolyBenchC benchmark suite, for a small overhead in binary size ( 7.18 % larger) and type-checking time (1.4% slower). We also prove type and memory safety of Wasm-precheck, prove Wasm safely embeds into Wasm-precheck ensuring backwards compatibility, prove Wasm-precheck type-erases to Wasm, and discuss design and implementation trade-offs.

Contemporary proof assistants such as Coq require that recursive functions be terminating and corecursive functions be productive to maintain logical consistency of their type theories, and some ensure these properties using syntactic checks. However, being syntactic, they are inherently delicate and restrictive, preventing users from easily writing obviously terminating or productive functions at their whim. Meanwhile, there exist many sized type theories that perform type-based termination and productivity checking, including theories based on the Calculus of (Co)Inductive Constructions (CIC), the core calculus underlying Coq. These theories are more robust and compositional in comparison. So why haven’t they been adapted to Coq? In this paper, we venture to answer this question with CIC $\hat{\ast }$ , a sized type theory based on CIC. It extends past work on sized types in CIC with additional Coq features such as global and local definitions. We also present a corresponding size inference algorithm and implement it within Coq’s kernel; for maximal backward compatibility with existing Coq developments, it requires no additional annotations from the user. In our evaluation of the implementation, we find a severe performance degradation when compiling parts of the Coq standard library, inherent to the algorithm itself. We conclude that if we wish to maintain backward compatibility, using size inference as a replacement for syntactic checking is impractical in terms of performance.

Many programmers use dependently typed languages such as Coq to machine-verify high-assurance software. However, existing compilers for these languages provide no guarantees after compiling, nor when linking after compilation. Type-preserving compilers preserve guarantees encoded in types and then use type checking to verify compiled code and ensure safe linking with external code. Unfortunately, standard compiler passes do not preserve the dependent typing of commonly used (intensional) type theories. This is because assumptions valid in simpler type systems no longer hold, and intensional dependent type systems are highly sensitive to syntactic changes, including compilation. We develop an A-normal form (ANF) translation with join-point optimization—a standard translation for making control flow explicit in functional languages—from the Extended Calculus of Constructions (ECC) with dependent elimination of booleans and natural numbers (a representative subset of Coq). Our dependently typed target language has equality reflection, allowing the type system to encode semantic equality of terms. This is key to proving type preservation and correctness of separate compilation for this translation. This is the first ANF translation for dependent types. Unlike related translations, it supports the universe hierarchy, and does not rely on parametricity or impredicativity.

A fully abstract compiler guarantees that two source components are observationally equivalent in the source language if and only if their translations are observationally equivalent in the target. Full abstraction implies the translation is secure: target-language attackers can make no more observations of a compiled component than a source-language attacker interacting with the original source component. Proving full abstraction for realistic compilers is challenging because realistic target languages contain features (such as control effects) unavailable in the source, while proofs of full abstraction require showing that every target context to which a compiled component may be linked can be back-translated to a behaviorally equivalent source context.

We prove the first full abstraction result for a translation whose target language contains exceptions, but the source does not. Our translation—specifically, closure conversion of simply typed λ-calculus with recursive types—uses types at the target level to ensure that a compiled component is never linked with attackers that have more distinguishing power than source-level attackers. We present a new back-translation technique based on a shallow embedding of the target language into the source language at a dynamic type. Then boundaries are inserted that mediate terms between the untyped embedding and the strongly-typed source. This technique allows back-translating non-terminating programs, target features that are untypeable in the source, and well-bracketed effects.