Szlachányi’s skew monoidal categories are a well-motivated variation of monoidal categories in which the unitors and associator are not required to be natural isomorphisms, but merely natural transformations in a particular direction. We present a sequent calculus for skew monoidal categories, building on the recent formulation by one of the authors of a sequent calculus for the Tamari order (skew semigroup categories). In this calculus, antecedents consist of a stoup (an optional formula) followed by a context, and the connectives behave like in the standard monoidal sequent calculus except that the left rules may only be applied in stoup position. We prove that this calculus is sound and complete with respect to existence of maps in the free skew monoidal category, and moreover that it captures equality of maps once a suitable equivalence relation is imposed on derivations. We then identify a subsystem of focused derivations and establish that it contains exactly one canonical representative from each equivalence class. This coherence theorem leads directly to simple procedures for deciding equality of maps in the free skew monoidal category and for enumerating any homset without duplicates. Finally, and in the spirit of Lambek’s work, we describe the close connection between this proof-theoretic analysis and Bourke and Lack’s recent characterization of skew monoidal categories as left representable skew multicategories. We have formalized this development in the dependently typed programming language Agda.

Every context-free grammar can be transformed into an equivalent one in the Chomsky normal form by a sequence of four transformations. In this work on formalization of language theory, we prove formally in the Agda dependently typed programming language that each of these transformations is correct in the sense of making progress toward normality and preserving the language of the given grammar. Also, we show that the right sequence of these transformations leads to a grammar in the Chomsky normal form (since each next transformation preserves the normality properties established by the previous ones) that accepts the same language as the given grammar. As we work in a constructive setting, soundness and completeness proofs are functions converting between parse trees in the normalized and original grammars.