Mixed choice multiparty message passing is an expressive concurrency programming paradigm where components use non-determinism to choose between concurrent options for sending and receiving messages. This flexibility makes it possible to program advanced algorithms, such as leader election protocols, succinctly. We present Mixtris, a mechanised higher-order separation logic for reasoning about functional correctness of higher-order imperative programs with mixed choice multiparty message passing in a shared memory setting. Mixtris builds upon recent work on separation logic for (non-mixed choice) multiparty message-passing programs, by drawing inspiration from session type systems for mixed choice multiparty message-passing programs. Mixtris is the first program logic for mixed choice multiparty message passing. We prove soundness of Mixtris using a novel model of our mixed choice multiparty protocols. We demonstrate how Mixtris can be used to formally reason about challenging examples, including some leader election protocols such as Chang and Roberts’s ring leader election protocol. All the results in the paper (both meta-theory and examples) have been formalised in the Rocq proof assistant on top of the Iris program logic framework.

Semantic typing has become a powerful tool for program verification, applying the technique of logical relations as not only a proof method, but also a device for prescribing program behavior. In recent work, Yao et al. scaled semantic typing to the verification of timed message-passing protocols, which are prevalent in, e.g., IoT and real-time systems applications. The appeal of semantic typing in this context is precisely because of its ability to support typed and untyped program components alike – including physical objects – which caters to the heterogeneity of these applications. Another demand inherent to these applications is timing: constraining the time or time window within which a message exchange must happen. Yao et al. equipped their logical relation not only with temporal predicates, but also with computable trajectories, to supply the evidence that an inhabitant can step from one time point to another one. While Yao et al. provide the formalization for such a verification tool, it lacks a mechanization. Mechanizing the system would not only provide a machine proof for it, but also facilitate scalability for future extensions and applications. This paper tackles the challenge of mechanizing the resulting proof-relevant logical relation in a proof assistant. allowing trajectories to be interleaved, partitioned, and concatenated, while the intended equality on trajectories is the equality of their graphs when seen as processes indexed by time. Unfortunately, proof assistants based on intensional type theory only have modest support for such equations, forcing a prolific use of transports. This paper reports on the process of mechanizing Yao et al.‘s results, comprising the logical relation, the algebra of computable trajectories with supporting lemmas, and the fundamental theorem of the logical relation, in the Rocq theorem prover.

Today’s computing landscape has been gradually shifting to applications targeting distributed and heterogeneous systems, such as cloud computing and Internet of Things (IoT) applications. These applications are predominantly concurrent, employ message-passing, and interface with foreign objects, ranging from externally implemented code to actual physical devices such as sensors. Verifying that the resulting systems adhere to the intended protocol of interaction is challenging – the usual assumption of a common implementation language, let alone a type system, no longer applies, ruling out any verification method based on them. This paper develops a framework for certifying protocol compliance of heterogeneous message-passing systems. It contributes the first mechanization of a language-agnostic logical relation, asserting that its inhabitants comply with the protocol specified. This definition relies entirely on a labelled transition-based semantics, accommodating arbitrary inhabitants, typed and untyped alike, including foreign objects. As a case study, the paper considers two scenarios: (1) per-instance verification of a specific application or hardware device, and (2) once-and-for-all verification of well-typed applications for a given type system. The logical relation and both scenarios are mechanized in the Coq theorem prover.

Type refinements combine the compositionality of typechecking with the expressivity of program logics, offering a synergistic approach to program verification. In this paper we apply dependent type refinements to SAX, a futures-based process calculus that arises from the Curry-Howard interpretation of the intuitionistic semi-axiomatic sequent calculus and includes unrestricted recursion both at the level of types and processes. With our type refinement system, we can reason about the partial correctness of SAX programs, complementing prior work on sized type refinements that supports reasoning about termination. Our design regime synthesizes the infinitary proof theory of SAX with that of bidirectional typing and Hoare logic, deriving some standard reasoning principles for data and (co)recursion while enabling information hiding for codata. We prove syntactic type soundness, which entails a notion of partial correctness that respects codata encapsulation. We illustrate our language through a few simple examples.