Reference. Mathematicians put AI model AlphaProof to the test

Talia Ringer · · DOI

Cite

Cite as @ringer-2025-mathematicians (helia, typst) · \cite{ringer-2025-mathematicians} (LaTeX)
BibTeX
bibtex · 1 line
@article{ringer-2025-mathematicians, title={Mathematicians put AI model AlphaProof to the test}, volume={651}, ISSN={1476-4687}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-03585-5}, DOI={10.1038/d41586-025-03585-5}, number={8106}, journal={Nature}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Ringer, Talia}, year={2025}, month=Nov, pages={595–597} }
hayagriva YAML (typst)
yaml · 16 lines
ringer-2025-mathematicians:
  type: article
  title: Mathematicians put AI model AlphaProof to the test
  author: Ringer, Talia
  date: 2025-11
  page-range: 595-597
  url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-03585-5
  serial-number:
    doi: 10.1038/d41586-025-03585-5
    issn: 1476-4687
  parent:
    type: periodical
    title: Nature
    publisher: Springer Science, Business Media LLC
    issue: 8106
    volume: 651
Cites 5 works (1 here)
With notes (1)

QED at Large: A Survey of Engineering of Formally Verified Software ringer-2019-qed

Development of formal proofs of correctness of programs can increase actual and perceived reliability and facilitate better understanding of program specifications and their underlying assumptions. Tools supporting such development have been available for over 40 years, but have only recently seen wide practical use. Projects based on construction of machine-checked formal proofs are now reaching an unprecedented scale, comparable to large software projects, which leads to new challenges in proof development and maintenance. Despite its increasing importance, the field of proof engineering is seldom considered in its own right; related theories, techniques, and tools span many fields and venues. This survey of the literature presents a holistic understanding of proof engineering for program correctness, covering impact in practice, foundations, proof automation, proof organization, and practical proof development.
DOI
ringer-2025-mathematicians reference entries/refs/ringer-2025-mathematicians/ringer-2025-mathematicians.hel