Inspired by Plotkin and Power’s algebraic treatment of computational effects and the principle of notions of computations as monoids, we propose a categorical framework for equational theories and models of monoids equipped with operations. This framework generalises Plotkin and Power’s algebraic treatment of effectful operations taking or returning values as input or output to operations that may take or return computations as input or output. Additionally, to give semantic models of computational effects in a modular way, we introduce a formal theory of modular constructions of algebraic structures based on the framework of lifting functors along fibrations.

Ordered logics and type systems have been used in a variety of applications including computational linguistics, memory allocation, stream processing, logical frameworks, parametricity, and enforcing security protocols. In most formulations, ordered types are also linear, requiring each resource to be used exactly once. Prior work by Kanovich et al. has investigated calculi that relax this constraint through subexponentials within a linear ordered logic. We generalize their work by using adjoint modalities to combine logics with varying fine-grained structural properties, including weakening, left contraction, right contraction, left mobility, and right mobility. We show that the resulting sequent calculus admits cut elimination. We further provide a natural deduction formulation in which structural rules are implicit, and show that proof checking for this system is decidable. This makes it a suitable foundation for an expressive adjoint programming language or logical framework.

We consider the problem of constructing the free bifibration generated by a functor of categories $𝑝:𝐷\to 𝐶$. This problem was previously considered by Lamarche, and is closely related to the problem, considered by Dawson, Paré, and Pronk, of “freely adjoining adjoints” to a category. We develop a proof-theoretic approach to the problem, beginning with a construction of the free bifibration ${\mathrm{\Lambda }}_{𝑝}:𝐵𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑏(𝑝)\to 𝐶$ in which objects of $𝐵𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑏(𝑝)$ are formulas of a primitive “bifibrational logic”, and arrows are derivations in a cut-free sequent calculus modulo a notion of permutation equivalence. We show that instantiating the construction to the identity functor generates a _zigzag double category_ $\mathbb{Z}(𝐶)$, which is also the free double category with companions and conjoints (or fibrant double category) on $𝐶$. The approach adapts smoothly to the more general task of building $(𝑃,𝑁)$-fibrations, where one only asks for pushforwards along arrows in $𝑃$ and pullbacks along arrows in $𝑁$ for some subsets of arrows; this encompasses Kock and Joyal’s notion of _ambifibration_ when $(𝑃,𝑁)$ form a factorization system. We establish a series of progressively stronger normal forms, guided by ideas of _focusing_ from proof theory, and obtain a canonicity result under assumption that the base category is factorization preordered relative to $𝑃$ and $𝑁$. This canonicity result allows us to decide the word problem and to enumerate relative homsets without duplicates. Finally, we describe several examples of a combinatorial nature, including a category of plane trees generated as a free bifibration over $𝜔$, and a category of increasing forests generated as a free ambifibration over $\mathrm{\Delta }$, which contains the lattices of noncrossing partitions as quotients of its fibers by the Beck-Chevalley condition for bicartesian squares.

We present Dependent Lambek Calculus (Lambek${\begin{array}{}\end{array}}^{𝙳}$), a domain-specific dependent type theory for verified parsing and formal grammar theory. In Lambek${\begin{array}{}\end{array}}^{𝙳}$, linear types are used as a syntax for formal grammars, and parsers can be written as linear terms. The linear typing restriction provides a form of intrinsic verification that a parser yields only valid parse trees for the input string. We demonstrate the expressivity of this system by showing that the combination of inductive linear types and dependency on non-linear data can be used to encode commonly used grammar formalisms such as regular and context-free grammars as well as traces of various types of automata. Using these encodings, we define parsers for regular expressions using deterministic automata, as well as examples of verified parsers of context-free grammars.

We present a denotational semantics of our type theory that interprets the linear types as functions from strings to sets of abstract parse trees and terms as parse transformers. Based on this denotational semantics, we have made a prototype implementation of Lambek${\begin{array}{}\end{array}}^{𝙳}$ using a shallow embedding in the Agda proof assistant. All of our examples parsers have been implemented in this prototype implementation.

Ordered, linear, and other substructural type systems allow us to expose deep properties of programs at the syntactic level of types. In this paper, we develop a family of unary logical relations that allow us to prove consequences of parametricity for a range of substructural type systems. A key idea is to parameterize the relation by an algebra, which we exemplify with a monoid and commutative monoid to interpret ordered and linear type systems, respectively. We prove the fundamental theorem of logical relations and apply it to deduce extensional properties of inhabitants of certain types. Examples include demonstrating that the ordered types for list append and reversal are inhabited by exactly one function, as are types of some tree traversals. Similarly, the linear type of the identity function on lists is inhabited only by permutations of the input. Our most advanced example shows that the ordered type of the list fold function is inhabited only by the fold function.

We sketch a tentative proof of P-completeness for the $𝛽$-convertibility problem on untyped planar (a.k.a. ordered or non-commutative) $𝜆$-terms.

Abstract categorial grammars (ACGs) is an expressive grammatical framework whose formal properties have been extensively studied. While it can provide its own account, as a grammar, of linguistic phenomena, it is known to encode several grammatical formalisms, including context-free grammars, but also mildly context-sensitive formalisms such as tree-adjoining grammars or m-linear context-free rewriting systems for which parsing is polynomial. The ACG toolkit we present provides a compiler, acgc, that checks and turns ACGs into representations that are suitable for testing and parsing, used in the acg interpreter. We illustrate these functionalities and discuss implementation features, in particular the Datalog reduction on which parsing is based, and the magic set rewriting techniques that can further be applied.

Szlachányi’s skew monoidal categories are a well-motivated variation of monoidal categories in which the unitors and associator are not required to be natural isomorphisms, but merely natural transformations in a particular direction. We present a sequent calculus for skew monoidal categories, building on the recent formulation by one of the authors of a sequent calculus for the Tamari order (skew semigroup categories). In this calculus, antecedents consist of a stoup (an optional formula) followed by a context, and the connectives behave like in the standard monoidal sequent calculus except that the left rules may only be applied in stoup position. We prove that this calculus is sound and complete with respect to existence of maps in the free skew monoidal category, and moreover that it captures equality of maps once a suitable equivalence relation is imposed on derivations. We then identify a subsystem of focused derivations and establish that it contains exactly one canonical representative from each equivalence class. This coherence theorem leads directly to simple procedures for deciding equality of maps in the free skew monoidal category and for enumerating any homset without duplicates. Finally, and in the spirit of Lambek’s work, we describe the close connection between this proof-theoretic analysis and Bourke and Lack’s recent characterization of skew monoidal categories as left representable skew multicategories. We have formalized this development in the dependently typed programming language Agda.

Categorical compositional distributional semantics is a model of natural language; it combines the statistical vector space models of words with the compositional models of grammar. We formalise in this model the generalised quantifier theory of natural language, due to Barwise and Cooper. The underlying setting is a compact closed category with bialgebras. We start from a generative grammar formalisation and develop an abstract categorical compositional semantics for it, and then instantiate the abstract setting to sets and relations and to finite-dimensional vector spaces and linear maps. We prove the equivalence of the relational instantiation to the truth theoretic semantics of generalised quantifiers. The vector space instantiation formalises the statistical usages of words and enables us to, for the first time, reason about quantified phrases and sentences compositionally in distributional semantics.

We introduce a sequent calculus with a simple restriction of Lambek’s product rules that precisely captures the classical Tamari order, i.e., the partial order on fully-bracketed words (equivalently, binary trees) induced by a semi-associative law (equivalently, right rotation). We establish a focusing property for this sequent calculus (a strengthening of cut-elimination), which yields the following coherence theorem: every valid entailment in the Tamari order has exactly one focused derivation. We then describe two main applications of the coherence theorem, including: 1. A new proof of the lattice property for the Tamari order, and 2. A new proof of the Tutte-Chapoton formula for the number of intervals in the Tamari lattice ${𝑌}_{𝑛}$.

In this paper, we investigate how to introduce dependent types into the substructural calculi such as the Lambek calculus and linear logic. The motivations of such a move include facilitating a closer correspondence between syntax and semantics in natural language analysis and developing promising applications such as that to concurrency through dependent session types.

We shall present two substructural calculi with dependent types: the first containing dependent Lambek types and the second dependent linear types. Technically, the former adheres to the usual assumption that types do not depend on substructural variables (in this case, the Lambek variables), which makes the technical development easier, while the latter allows type dependency on linear variables, which makes the development more challenging as well as more interesting in applications.

The standard reading of type theory through the lens of category theory is based on the idea of viewing a type system as a category of well-typed terms. We propose a basic revision of this reading: rather than interpreting type systems as categories, we describe them as functors from a category of typing derivations to a category of underlying terms. Then, turning this around, we explain how in fact any functor gives rise to a generalized type system, with an abstract notion of typing judgment, typing derivations and typing rules. This leads to a purely categorical reformulation of various natural classes of type systems as natural classes of functors.

The main purpose of this paper is to describe the general framework (which can also be seen as providing a categorical analysis of refinement types), and to present a few applications. As a larger case study, we revisit Reynolds’ paper on “The Meaning of Types” (2000), showing how the paper’s main results may be reconstructed along these lines.

Having been under the impression that categorial grammars in general and the so-called syntactic calculus in particular had been swept away by the tide of transformational grammar, I was very surprised to learn of the recent revival of interest in these matters, as, for example, by Buszkowski in Poland and by van Benthem in the Netherlands. Stimulated by the renewed activity in this area, I decided to take another look at it, and in particular, to explore the categorical connection, which had been at the back of my mind all along.