We study exact discretization as a semantics-preserving transformation for recursive, higher-order probabilistic programs with continuous distributions. We target programs where continuous values are compared against finitely many constants, so exact inference reduces to a discrete problem. Our central technical contribution is a non-local, type-directed analysis that infers where continuous values can be partitioned into finitely many observationally relevant regions, then rewrites sampling and comparison behavior over those regions. We call this transformation Slice. Because this construction is global and type-directed, correctness requires reasoning beyond the local syntax: we formalize the transformation and prove soundness for boolean queries using a coupling-style logical relations argument over operational semantics. As an application, transformed programs can be executed by discrete engines such as Dice, Roulette, and Storm. Our empirical evaluation shows two complementary strengths of Slice when paired with discrete backends: it enables exact inference for challenging continuous programs that lie beyond the reach of previous exact systems, and, on benchmarks where direct comparison is possible, it is competitive with state-of-the-art exact inference systems for continuous programs.

In the context of probabilistic programs, an oblivious adversary resolves nondeterminism without seeing the outcomes of random draws. Obliviousness is a common assumption in online algorithms and distributed protocols, but the complex interaction between random draws and adversarial choices makes it challenging to reason about correctness. While there has been significant progress toward reasoning about programs that combine randomization with nondeterminism, most of the work has focused on the adaptive model, whose omniscient view of program state is too powerful to establish correctness for certain classes of programs. We introduce Oblivious Probabilistic Outcome Logic (opOL), a new logic for reasoning about probabilistic programs with nondeterminism controlled by an oblivious adversary. Building on Outcome Logic and Probabilistic Separation Logic, opOL models adversarial choice as a resource and uses probabilistic independence to ensure that random outcomes are hidden from the adversary. The opOL proof system provides expressive and compositional rules for case analysis on both random and nondeterministic outcomes, and for proving almost-sure termination. Expressivity is tested through several case studies, including a paging algorithm and a leader election protocol. The opOL metatheory and case studies are mechanized in Lean 4.

When designing a network, engineers must navigate trade-offs (e.g., one topology offers more aggregate bandwidth, another lower latency or better resilience) that demand reasoning about quantitative properties. We present a fast analyzer for quantitative network properties based on weighted NetKAT (wNetKAT), a domain-specific language that provides a semantic foundation for quantitative reasoning by modeling network behavior using weights drawn from a semiring. At the core of our development is the design of a symbolic data structure – weighted symbolic packet programs (wSPPs) – that compactly represent the semantics of weighted policies, for which a direct implementation would be intractable. We show how to compute all policy constructs symbolically; unsurprisingly, the crux is Kleene star, for which we design a tailored algorithm. We further develop trace-carrying Pareto semirings, which compute multi-objective frontiers together with the network paths that realize them. We formalize the development in Lean and provide an optimized Rust implementation. Being parametric on a semiring, our implementation covers both classical and quantitative analyses: we show that it is competitive with KATch, a heavily optimized Boolean-reachability verifier, and orders of magnitude faster than McNetKAT and Storm on probabilistic analyses. A case study comparing Fat-tree and Jellyfish data-center topologies shows the framework supports multi-objective design-time analysis.

We introduce weighted NetKAT, a domain-specific language for modeling and verifying quantitative quantitative network properties. The language is parametric on a semiring , enabling the treatment of a wide range of quantities in a uniform way. We provide a denotational semantics and an equivalent operational semantics, the latter based on a novel model of weighted NetKAT automata ( WNKA ) capturing the stateful behavior of our language. With WNKA , we obtain a class of generic decision procedures for reasoning about quantitative safety and reachability in a fully automatic way, even in the presence of possibly unbounded iteration. We demonstrate the applicability of our framework in a case study using Internet2’s Abilene network as the underlying topology.

Although randomization has long been used in distributed computing, formal methods for reasoning aboutprobabilistic concurrent programs have lagged behind. No existing program logics can express specificationsabout the full distributions of outcomes resulting from programs that are both probabilistic and concurrent. To address this, we introduce Probabilistic Concurrent Outcome Logic ( pcOL ), which incorporates ideas fromconcurrent and probabilistic separation logics into Outcome Logic to introduce new compositional reasoningprinciples. At its core, pcOL reinterprets the rules of Concurrent Separation Logic in a setting where separationmodels probabilistic independence, so as to compositionally describe joint distributions over variables inconcurrent threads. Reasoning about outcomes also proves crucial, as case analysis is often necessary to deriveprecise information about threads that rely on randomized shared state. We demonstrate pcOL on a variety ofexamples, including to prove almost sure termination of unbounded loops.

We present an SMT-based active learning algorithm for nondeterministic weighted automata (WFAs) as a practical and robust alternative to Hankel/${𝘓}^{\star }$-style methods. Our algorithm is parametric in a given semiring and, if it terminates, guaranteed to produce minimal WFAs. We prove partial correctness and provide a sufficient termination condition, which in particular implies termination for all finite semirings. Our extensive experimental evaluation shows that our algorithm is capable of learning numerous minimal WFAs over both finite and infinite semirings, vastly outperforms a naive baseline, and is competitive with a state-of-the-art algorithm while producing significantly smaller automata and requiring less interaction with the teacher.

Behavioural distances provide a quantitative approach to comparing the states of transition systems, moving beyond traditional Boolean notions of equivalence. In this paper, we develop a sound and complete axiomatisation of behavioural distance for nondeterministic processes using Milner’s charts, a model that generalises finite-state automata by incorporating variable outputs. Charts provide a compelling setting for studying behavioural distances because they shift the focus from language equivalence to bisimilarity. Their axiomatic study lays the groundwork for quantitative analysis of more expressive models, such as weighted transition systems. To formalise this approach, we adopt string diagrams as our syntax of choice. String diagrams closely mirror the graphical structure of charts, while providing a rigorous formalism that supports inductive reasoning and compositional semantics. Unlike traditional algebraic syntaxes, which require additional mechanisms such as binders and substitution, string diagrams offer a variable-free representation where recursion naturally decomposes into simpler components. This makes them well-suited for reasoning about behavioural distances and aligns with broader efforts to axiomatise automata-theoretic equivalences through a unified diagrammatic framework.

We extend the synthetic theories of discrete and Gaussian categorical probability by introducing a diagrammatic calculus for reasoning about hybrid probabilistic models in which continuous random variables, conditioned on discrete ones, follow a multivariate Gaussian distribution. This setting includes important families of distributions such as Gaussian mixtures, where each Gaussian component is selected according to a discrete variable. We develop a string diagrammatic syntax for distributions of this type, give it a compositional semantics, and equip it with a sound and complete equational theory that characterises when two mixtures represent the same distribution.

This booklet serves as an introduction to Kleene Algebra (KA), a set of laws that can be used to study general equivalences between programs. It discusses how general programs can be modeled using regular expressions, how those expressions correspond to automata, and how this correspondence can be exploited to obtain the central result of KA, namely that an equivalence of regular expressions is true if and only if it can be proved using the laws of KA. Each chapter closes with a set of exercises to further build intuition and understanding, and there is an optional chapter that develops automata theory through the lens of coalgebra.

We develop StacKAT, a network verification language featuring loops, finite state variables, nondeterminism, and—most importantly—access to a stack with accompanying push and pop operations. By viewing the variables and stack as the (parsed) headers and (to-be-parsed) contents of a network packet, StacKAT can express a wide range of network behaviors including parsing, source routing, and telemetry. These behaviors are difficult or impossible to model using existing languages like NetKAT . We develop a decision procedure for StacKAT program equivalence, based on finite automata. This decision procedure provides the theoretical basis for verifying network-wide properties and is able to provide counterexamples for inequivalent programs. Finally, we provide an axiomatization of StacKAT equivalence and establish its completeness.

NetKAT is a domain-specific programming language and logic that has been successfully used to specify and verify the behavior of packet-switched networks. This paper develops techniques for automatically learning NetKAT models of unknown networks using active learning. Prior work has explored active learning for a wide range of automata (e.g., deterministic, register, Büchi, timed etc.) and also developed applications, such as validating implementations of network protocols. We present algorithms for learning different types of NetKAT automata, including symbolic automata proposed in recent work. We prove the soundness of these algorithms, build a prototype implementation, and evaluate it on a standard benchmark. Our results highlight the applicability of symbolic NetKAT learning for realistic network configurations and topologies.

Programs increasingly rely on randomization in applications such as cryptography and machine learning. Analyzing randomized programs has been a fruitful research direction, but there is a gap when programs also exploit nondeterminism(for concurrency, efficiency, or algorithmic design). In this paper, we introduce Demonic Outcome Logic for reasoning about programs that exploit both randomization and nondeterminism. The logic includes several novel features, such as reasoning about multiple executions in tandem and manipulating pre- and postconditions using familiar equational laws—including the distributive law of probabilistic choices over nondeterministic ones. We also give rules for loops that both establish termination and quantify the distribution of final outcomes from a single premise. We illustrate the reasoning capabilities of Demonic Outcome Logic through several case studies, including the Monty Hall problem, an adversarial protocol for simulating fair coins, and a heuristic based probabilistic SAT solver.

We propose Weighted Guarded Kleene Algebra with Tests (wGKAT), an uninterpreted weighted programming language equipped with branching, conditionals, and loops. We provide an operational semantics for wGKAT using a variant of weighted automata and introduce a sound and complete axiomatization. We also provide a polynomial time decision procedure for bisimulation equivalence.

We develop a denotational model for probabilistic and concurrent imperative programs, a class of programs with standard control flow via conditionals and while-loops, as well as probabilistic actions and parallel composition. Whereas semantics for concurrent or randomized programs in isolation is well studied, their combination has not been thoroughly explored and presents unique challenges. The crux of the problem is that interactions between control flow, probabilistic actions, and concurrent execution cannot be captured by straightforward generalizations of prior work on pomsets and convex languages, prominent models for those effects, individually. Our model has good domain theoretic properties, important for semantics of unbounded loops. We also prove two adequacy theorems, showing that the model subsumes typical powerdomain semantics for concurrency and convex powerdomain semantics for probabilistic nondeterminism.

Program logics for bug-finding (such as the recently introduced Incorrectness Logic) have framed correctness and incorrectness as dual concepts requiring different logical foundations. In this paper, we argue that a single unified theory can be used for both correctness and incorrectness reasoning. We present Outcome Logic (OL), a novel generalization of Hoare Logic that is both monadic (to capture computational effects) and monoidal (to reason about outcomes and reachability). OL expresses true positive bugs, while retaining correctness reasoning abilities as well. To formalize the applicability of OL to both correctness and incorrectness, we prove that any false OL specification can be disproven in OL itself. We also use our framework to reason about new types of incorrectness in nondeterministic and probabilistic programs. Given these advances, we advocate for OL as a new foundational theory of correctness and incorrectness.

Guarded Kleene Algebra with Tests (GKAT) is a variation on Kleene Algebra with Tests (KAT) that arises by restricting the union (+) and iteration (*) operations from KAT to predicate-guarded versions. We develop the (co)algebraic theory of GKAT and show how it can be efficiently used to reason about imperative programs. In contrast to KAT, whose equational theory is PSPACE-complete, we show that the equational theory of GKAT is (almost) linear time. We also provide a full Kleene theorem and prove completeness for an analogue of Salomaa’s axiomatization of Kleene Algebra.

Automata learning is a technique that has successfully been applied in verification, with the automaton type varying depending on the application domain. Adaptations of automata learning algorithms for increasingly complex types of automata have to be developed from scratch because there was no abstract theory offering guidelines. This makes it hard to devise such algorithms, and it obscures their correctness proofs. We introduce a simple category-theoretic formalism that provides an appropriately abstract foundation for studying automata learning. Furthermore, our framework establishes formal relations between algorithms for learning, testing, and minimization. We illustrate its generality with two examples: deterministic and weighted automata.

We give a new presentation of Brzozowski’s algorithm to minimize finite automata using elementary facts from universal algebra and coalgebra and building on earlier work by Arbib and Manes on a categorical presentation of Kalman duality between reachability and observability. This leads to a simple proof of its correctness and opens the door to further generalizations. Notably, we derive algorithms to obtain minimal language equivalent automata from Moore nondeterministic and weighted automata.

The powerset construction is a standard method for converting a nondeterministic automaton into a deterministic one recognizing the same language. In this paper, we lift the powerset construction from automata to the more general framework of coalgebras with structured state spaces. Coalgebra is an abstract framework for the uniform study of different kinds of dynamical systems. An endofunctor F determines both the type of systems (F-coalgebras) and a notion of behavioural equivalence (~_F) amongst them. Many types of transition systems and their equivalences can be captured by a functor F. For example, for deterministic automata the derived equivalence is language equivalence, while for non-deterministic automata it is ordinary bisimilarity. We give several examples of applications of our generalized determinization construction, including partial Mealy machines, (structured) Moore automata, Rabin probabilistic automata, and, somewhat surprisingly, even pushdown automata. To further witness the generality of the approach we show how to characterize coalgebraically several equivalences which have been object of interest in the concurrency community, such as failure or ready semantics.