Reference. Double Orthogonal Factorization Systems

We define strict and lax orthogonal factorization systems on double categories. These consist of an orthogonal factorization system on arrows and one on double cells that are compatible with each other. Our definitions are motivated by several explicit examples, including factorization systems on double categories of spans, relations and bimodules. We then prove monadicity results for orthogonal factorization systems on double categories in order to justify our definitions. For fibrant double categories we discuss the structure of the double orthogonal factorization systems that have a given orthogonal factorization system on the arrows in common. Finally, we study the interaction of orthogonal factorization systems on double categories with double fibrations.

Cite

Cite as @aberle-2025-double (helia, typst) · \cite{aberle-2025-double} (LaTeX)
BibTeX
bibtex · 8 lines
@misc{aberle-2025-double,
  author = {CB Aberle and Elena Caviglia and Matthew Kukla and Rubén Maldonado and Luca Mesiti and Dorette Pronk and Tanjona Ralaivaosaona},
  title = {Double Orthogonal Factorization Systems},
  year = {2025},
  month = {9},
  eprint = {2509.26343},
  archiveprefix = {arXiv}
}
hayagriva YAML (typst)
yaml · 14 lines
aberle-2025-double:
  type: misc
  title: Double Orthogonal Factorization Systems
  author:
  - Aberle, CB
  - Caviglia, Elena
  - Kukla, Matthew
  - Maldonado, Rubén
  - Mesiti, Luca
  - Pronk, Dorette
  - Ralaivaosaona, Tanjona
  date: 2025-09
  serial-number:
    arxiv: '2509.26343'
Cites 20 works (1 here)
With notes (1)

Framed bicategories and monoidal fibrations shulman_2008

In some bicategories, the 1-cells are ‘morphisms’ between the 0-cells, such as functors between categories, but in others they are ‘objects’ over the 0-cells, such as bimodules, spans, distributors, or parametrized spectra. Many bicategorical notions do not work well in these cases, because the ‘morphisms between 0-cells’, such as ring homomorphisms, are missing. We can include them by using a pseudo double category, but usually these morphisms also induce base change functors acting on the 1-cells. We avoid complicated coherence problems by describing base change ‘nonalgebraically’, using categorical fibrations. The resulting ‘framed bicategories’ assemble into 2-categories, with attendant notions of equivalence, adjunction, and so on which are more appropriate for our examples than are the usual bicategorical ones.

We then describe two ways to construct framed bicategories. One is an analogue of rings and bimodules which starts from one framed bicategory and builds another. The other starts from a ‘monoidal fibration’, meaning a parametrized family of monoidal categories, and produces an analogue of the framed bicategory of spans. Combining the two, we obtain a construction which includes both enriched and internal categories as special cases.

Web
External (19)
aberle-2025-double reference entries/refs/aberle-2025-double/aberle-2025-double.hel